Tipra or Twipra
Some of our brothers and sisters have
coined/discovered new terminology/word Twipra/TwiPrasa for our identity which
will definitely in near future alienate the indigenous Tripuri people in their
own mother land, and I foresee that day is not very far. We have been misguided
by many of our so called leaders in the past and still being misguided by many
educated leaders. This new Terminology in long run would be counter productive,
against the interest of us and will have dangerous consequences; for our future
progeny, because it will reduce us to a refugee or immigrant status both the
name and identity in our historical mother land. Already we have been reduced o
minority status. What else do we want to be in our mother land, my fellow
Tripuri, just think it over!
Why are we taking the new identity of Twipra/Twiprasa
and on what interest? What way it will help us? I, frankly speaking do not
understand it. Why are we corrupting our own identity as well as our states
name! And in that way it is alienating our selves and our mother land.
I understand that Tripura is Indo-Aryan word, but
friends not the word Tipra and Tiprasa. It is purely kokborok word and its
derivatives, why is there so much hatred and aversion to these words? I just can
not understand it.
Some people would say that 'we will change the
name of Tripura to TwiPra.' Forget about such fanciful and childish imagination,
where as we could not change even a name of our village where we are majority,
how can we think of changing name of Tripura! For example we have not been able
to change Mandai to Mandwi, rather we are more comfortable and love to pronounce
as Mandai.
Regarding the root word or originality of Tripura,
none is proved beyond the doubt and unanimously accepted. The much talked
hypothesis put by Kailash Chandra Singha regarding the origin of Tripura as
Twi+pra is not sustainable with historical and geographical facts and evidence
available with us. Bupra means bifurcation of a branch of tree, so TwiPra would
mean bifurcation of river or stream. In whole of the north east there is no
river which got bifurcated into two in the course of its flow. Can any one name
such river? The only river which bifurcated is Ganga near Farrakka. But there is
not a single evidence of Tripura people living there at any period of time. So
this hypothesis is totally false, baseless and fanciful imagination of some of
our fellow people.
I have some historical documents to prove that
Tripura has originated from the word kiratipura, means kirataland; Rajmala also
mentioned that Tripura was earlier known as kirata desa. This word kiratipura>kartripura,
mentioned in Ashoka pillar than to >tripura.
We are all intelligent enough and educated people. My humble
submission to all is-do not believe in any one's opinion unless proofs are
provided about it or you think that it is logically explainable and rational.
Believe in your brain, rely on your judgment. Just do not believe me, analyze
your self with various examples and other circumstantial evidences, if you are
satisfied than believe me, other wise don't.
Any way, even if some one does not believe this theory that Tripura derived
from kiratipura>kartirpura>tripura, and presuming that it has derived from two
words Twi+pra TwiPra is not explainable and not sustainable as per kokborok
grammatical rule. TwiPra word is grammatically
WRONG.
Whether Tipra or Twipra?
Kokborok
Grammatical rules:
Here are some
examples, just think over it:
Example with Twi/Mui
Pre-words |
Twi+kolok (milok) |
Tilok, Tw>ti w & ko,
abolishes |
Not Twilok |
Twi+ari |
Tiari/Tiyari, Tw>Ti w,
abolishes |
Not TwiAri |
Mui+kolok |
Milok, Mu>Mi u & ko abolishes |
Not Muilok |
Examples of Pra Post-word
|
Lama+bupra |
Lampra, a & bu abolishes,
|
Not LamaPra |
Bufang +bupra |
Bupra, fang & bu banishes |
Not BufangPra |
Twi+bupra |
Tipra, tw>ti, w & bu abolishes
|
Can Not be Twipra
|
In these cases both pre
and post words changes and forms new words.
Now take other
examples:
Tok+chwla |
Togwla, k>g, ch abolishes
|
Not TokChwla |
Wak+bahan |
Wahan, K & ba abolishes |
Not WakHan |
Pun+bahan |
Puhan N & ba abolishes
|
Not PunHan |
Bini+hanok (sister) |
Bahanok, I>a, ni abolishes
|
Not BiniNok |
In these cases both the
pre and post words do not change, and forms new words just by joining adjacent:
Take other
examples:
Twi+Kormo |
TwiKormo |
No change in pre and post words
|
Twi+Sindrai |
TwiSindrai |
No change in pre and post words |
Twi+Thaiplok |
TwiThaiplok |
No change in pre and post words
|
There
is no changes in both pre and post words. Two words are just join together, so
it will not be Tikormo , Tisindrai or Tithaiplok.
If this kokborok
grammatical rule is to be applied than it has to be Twi+Bupra=TwiBupra
not TwiPra, as one can not change, delete part of
the pre or post words.
Pronouncing or writing as TwiPra breaks the
kokborok grammatical rules, it is grammatically wrong. No one can make his own
rule for a particular word. Why it happens no one knows it is kokborok grammar
rule, it happened since our ancestors' time!
So who had coined new words Twipra and TwiPrasa
breaking the kokborok grammatical rule a wrong kokborok word and on what
interest? Just think it over?
Similar examples exist even with many other
languages like English, Hindi, Sanskrit, and Bengali alike.
Just one example:
Octus+pedus =Octopus, we can not make Octuspus or Octuspedus
And there are lakhs of
such examples.
Whether Tipra or Tripura? International
Examples:
It is 100% true that Tripura & Tripuri are not
kokborok words, but Tipra is! In most of the cases in the world, country/states
& people have two sort of identity, one by their own language and another by the
outer world's languages, whether it is a big country/race or small states/
races.
Known in the
outer world |
Known
By their own language |
Germany |
Deutsch |
China |
Zhongwen |
Japan |
Nippon |
Korea |
Dae-han-nin-guk |
Italy |
Italia |
India |
Bharata |
Bengali |
Bangali |
Assam |
Ahom |
Manipuri |
Meitei |
If such is the national and
international identity, then why not? |
Tipra |
Tripura |
Tiprasa |
Tripuri |
And the list goes on,
almost all the country/races have such double identity, so why not we Tiprasa?
Historical
evidences:
We, the Tripuri never used to pronounce as TwiPra to our mother land, so also
not as TwiPrasa. We used to and still pronounce as Tipra and Tiprasa. This was
pronounced after modification as Tippera or Tipperah by the British. I can give
provide several evidences from the writing of Sir Alexander Mackenzie, Sir E.F.
Sandys, Rev. James Long, Sir Grierson, Political agents of Tripura state, viz.
A.W.B. Power, Captain Lillington, Captain W.L. Samuel, T.E. Coxhead, C.W.
Bolton, F. Jones, G. Toynbee, J.A. Hopkins, S.S. Jones, R. T. Greer, J.E.
Webster, Mr. Campbell, and many more, they all had termed as Tippera or Tipperah
to our kingdom in the past, not as Twippera or Twipperah! Even our last king Bir
Bikram Manikya when used to communicate with British India govt, he would
address his kingdom as Tippera. But latter under the presser of Tripura kings
the British India's governor general accepted the name of Tripura in 1920 AD
and since than British people also addressed our state as Tripura.
We do not know whether Tripura is the modified form of Tipra or Tipra is the
modified form of Tripura as happens like Krishna is pronounced as Kisno among
Tripuri people. But it certain that we Tripuri people utter our mother land as
Tipra not as TwiPra.
Just think, analyze, introspect over it and decide
about the issue.
Source: 1. Administrative report of the
political Agency, Hill Tipperah Vol-I &II
2. Tripura state eastern boundary dispute By S.B.K.
Dev Burman.
3. The history of Tripura, by E.F. Sandys
4. Rajmala or Chronicle of Tripura by Rev. James
Long.
5. Tripura State Gazette Sangkalan.
|